Let’s Chat about… “Could No New Particles At The LHC Be Exactly What Physics Needs?”

On June 28, 2016, an article written by Sabine Hossenfelder appeared in Forbes Science entitled,Could No New Particles At The LHC Be Exactly What Physics Needs?  In this article she concludes by saying, “If the bump goes away, this would catapult us into what has become known as the “nightmare scenario” for the LHC: The Higgs and nothing else. Many particle physicists are afraid of this scenario because, if it comes true, it will leave them without guidance, lost in a thicket of rapidly multiplying models that threaten to block out sunlight. Without some new physics, everyone is concerned we’ll have nothing to work with that we haven’t had already for 50 years. Without any new inputs that can tell us which direction to look towards in the ultimate goal of unification and/or quantum gravity, we’d finally have to admit the truth: we’re completely lost.”

The only thing I would change in Sabine Hossenfelder’s article is the phrase “if the bump goes away” to “when the bump goes away”.  The question I have for Sabine Hossenfelder is…   Does she think that those who are completely lost will be able to find their way out without “outside” help?  Did Sabine not read my article, “The Top 10 Reasons Why Physicists Cannot Solve the Theory of Everything?  

I have contacted Sabine Hossenfelder and many other physics writers and journalists who probably believe there is no way that a single person who happens to be a non-physicist can lead the entire academic physics community out of the “thicket” to where the sun shines. I have sent review copies of my book to many physicists who have ignored it or even put it out for re-sale.

It is now time for me to predict the future…  I predict that there will be a lot of sore tushies on the backsides of physicists who had the chance to be ahead of the game by reading “Gordon’s Theory of Everything“.  The Gordon Model will become the basis to advance Gordon’s Theory of Everything and become the new working theory of our time… poised to revamp general relativity, quantum mechanic, and quantum field theory, as the theory that unites all theories, all laws, all equations, all particles, all forces, and all interactions that define our universe.

Let’s see how long it will take the physicists to acknowledge Gordon’s Theory of Everything and its most important concept “The Hierarchy of Energy” expressed by The GOD Equation as the basis for unifying everything.

The GOD Equation with copyright bold

Let’s chat about… Physicists just found a link between dark energy and the arrow of time

A recent article in “Science Alert” written by Brendan Cole entitled “Physicists just found a link between dark energy and the arrow of time“, physicists A. E. Allahverdyan and V. G. Gurzadyan are coming to the realization that dark energy plays a role in the arrow of time. In this article it is stated,”Physicists and astronomers in the 1990s expected something similar to have occurred after the big bang – an event that threw matter out in all directions. The collective gravity from all that matter should have slowed it all down, just like the Earth slows down the ball. But that’s not what they found. Instead, everything seems to have sped up. There’s something pervading the Universe that physically spreads space apart faster than gravity can pull things together. The effect is small – it’s only noticeable when you look at far-away galaxies – but it’s there. It’s become known as dark energy – “dark”, because no one knows what it is.

Not knowing what it is…, now that’s a real problem because these physicists are asserting an effect onto something they know nothing about.  They should read Gordon’s Theory of Everything which mathematically defines exactly what dark energy is.  Dark energy is the energy gradient within the E0 energy that creates the fabric of spacetime.  At the time of the big bang, the E0 energy gradient of spacetime was huge compared to the small E0 energy gradients generated by the E2 energy of mass containing particles existing “in” spacetime.  At the time of the Big Bang the huge E0 energy gradient  threw all the newly created particles containing mass outward.  The E0 energy gradient of the universe’s spacetime has been slowly decreasing ever since.

This article shows addresses a point made in a previous blog post http://thegodentity.com/wordpress/2016/02/15/lets-chat-about-primordial-soup/ where the missing knowledge and mathematical representation of dark energy is currently giving a false narrative of the events surrounding the big bang.

The secret to solving everything including the theory of everything is the hierarchy of energy where most of the energy of the universe remained in the E0 energy state.  E0 energy (E0 = m0c0)  [Note: m0 is not mass – but just like mass m2, it does represent the displacement and/or motion of spacetime’s E0 energy]. The entropy of spacetime is always increasing and it can never decrease, thus the arrow of time must always move forward for any interaction of particles taking place “in” spacetime.  Gordon’s Theory of Everything also shows why the big bang was a one time event.

 

Let’s chat about… Godless Universe: A Physicist Searches for Meaning in Nature

In an article appearing in Scientific American on May 10th. 2016, written by Clara Moskowitz entitled, “Godless Universe: A Physicist Searches for Meaning in Nature“, Moskowitz talks about Sean Carroll’s new book, “The Big Picture: On the Origin of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself”. In this book, Physicist Sean Carroll lays out his case to show how science has no place (or need) to accommodate for the notion of God.  The first sentence in the article reads, “It is time to face reality, California Institute of Technology theoretical physicist Sean Carroll says: There is just no such thing as God”.  Carroll goes on to coin the term “poetic naturalism” which represents the idea that “science can be used to discover meaning and morality.”

I disagree very strongly with Carroll’s proposal.  Didn’t Carroll ever watch the movie I Robot? Science represents algorithms, data, charts, graphs, data, and their numerical calculations.  In I Robot, a robot saves the hero (played by Will Smith) instead of saving an 11 year old child because the odds were slightly more in favor for Smith being successfully saved.  The problem with the “poetic naturalism” approach is that it does not take into account the human soul.  Each soul is special and each soul sees morality from a different perspective.  As an medical doctor (not a physicist), I see these different perspectives all the time and I also see that sometimes there is no definitive answer. Each person will need to follow his or her own heart using their own moral compass. When you put moral decisions into a “poetic naturalism” algorithm, you lose your independent humanity to those who created the algorithm of “the moral collective mind”.  In essence, you would no longer have a right to your independent soul in making your own moral decisions as you would be scorned or punished if you deviate from the “standards of morals” instituted by the collective.

But there is another aspect of this article to consider…   Who decided with absolute certainty that physics does not provide for God?  Many would say God “Always was, Always is, and Always will be.” God is all around us and is within us. God gave rise to us and everything else in the universe.  Yet because God cannot be directly “seen” with our own eyes, or observed by other means, or even revealed in any experiment, we just have to have “faith” and believe in the existence of God.  For this belief, physicists mock and scorn the faithful.

Carroll has made the mistake of leaving the realm of physics to become a philosopher without learning Gordon’s Theory of Everything.

Gordon’s Theory of Everything shows that before the Big Bang, all the energy of the universe always had existed as E0 energy which is proportional to c^0 in the form of a two dimensional planar universe.  The Big Bang represents this E0 energy undergoing a vacuum decay phenomenon as it finds a hidden dimension and reorganizes into a three dimensional spacetime. During this time, some of this E0 energy made the jump to E1 energy (light, EM radiation) and E2 energy (particles containing mass).  All the particles “in” spacetime are composed of E1 and E2 energy and this is all the energy physicists can “see”.

Gordon’s Theory of Everything tells us that E0 energy “Always was, Always is, and Always will be”.  E0 energy is the energy of spacetime that is all around us and within us.  E0 energy gave rise to us and everything else “in” spacetime.  Yet we can never directly “see” E0 energy with our eyes or our instruments, or directly reveal E0 energy in any experiment.  Physicists will just have to have “faith” and believe in the existence of E0 energy.  That is why I call the entity (not particle) that creates the spacetime energy medium, “The GOD Entity”, where GOD is an acronym for the Gordon Omnipresent Dot.

How ironic it is, that if physicists want to know the theory of everything, they will have to accept the GOD Entity on faith!   It kind of makes me feel all warm and fuzzy all over.

Let’s chat about… No, Science Is Not Faith-Based

In an article appearing in Forbes Science on March 8th. 2016, entitled, “No, Science Is Not Faith-Based“, physicist Ethan Siegel lays out his argument to show how science is not faith-based. He speaks of “faith” as a belief in something despite sufficient evidence making it certain.  So what makes something scientific?

Siegel explains that something can be accurately predicted based on evidence (I suppose this means experimental data). He also adds that there is flexibility in the process; that if evidence points to something as incorrect, then the concepts of what was understood to be true must change to reflect the new paradigm. So scientist must be willing to change their belief if new data is presented to support it.

In conclusion, Siegel states, “The fundamental question is neither what the object of humanity’s faith will be nor how far it will extend, but rather how far you’re willing-and-able to test your most deeply held beliefs, and whether you’ll have the courage to change your conclusions to follow where the evidence guides. That is what separates science from anything faith-based, and why any faith-based belief system will never be considered scientific.”

If Siegel (and the academic community) are to practice what Ethan is preaching, then Gordon’s theory of everything is about to give the ultimate test to physicists.  It will determine whether physicists are actually scientists or just “faithful” to their own beliefs.  Gordon theory of everything lays out a single comprehensive model that creates all the laws of physics, all the parameters used in physics, and everything in the universe without introducing anything more than its two primordial postulates.  The inevitable course of events creating our universe is predicted by a derivative mathematical progression.

This test is upon physicists now. Will physicists ever consider a theory based on spacetime as a medium? Over 100 years ago physicists had definitively “proven” that spacetime is not a medium. WIll physicists have the courage to change their conclusions? To make matters even worse, Gordon’s building block component (the GOD entity aka the Gordon Omnipresent Dot) that forms the spacetime medium can never be experimentally observed.  That is because the GOD entity is literally and physically impossible to experimentally find because doing so would break the laws of physics.  How ironic Siegel’s statement becomes…   In order for physicists to accept the theory of everything, they have to have faith in the GOD entity, which is something that can never be experimentally verified!

So Ethan, in your own words…   How far are you willing-and-able to test your most deeply held beliefs (spacetime is not a medium), and whether you’ll have the courage to change your conclusions to follow Gordon’s mathematical progression providing new evidence. Afterall Ethan,…    this “is what separates science from faith-based beliefs, and why any faith-based belief system will never be considered scientific.”

What a dilemma?  Not to change current physics theory would make science a faith-based belief and yet changing the scientific belief to include the GOD entity would mean that scientists would have to believe in something that can never be found.

…I have to admit, watching the physicists coming to grips with this unsatisfying reality will bring a very satisfying smile to my face.  🙂

Let’s Talk About… Why Is Relativity True?

An article appearing in Forbes / Science on Feb 24, 2016, physicist Chad Orzel tries to explain “Why Is Relativity True?”.  After reading the entire article, Orzel gives the only explanation that physicists can…  “It just is, the same as any other theory in science.” I must say I was looking for something more meaty than that. Yet my disappointment was not unexpected, this answer pierces through to the essence of why physicists have not figured out the theory of everything.

The fact is (determined through countless experimental observations) that the mathematics of Relativity will always be experimentally confirmed; however, the model of the universe portrayed by the mathematics of relativity is not correct.  This is a very strong statement which does not seem to make sense.  How can all the math be right yet the model it is representing be wrong?  It is possible because no one understands why the postulates used to derive the mathematics of relativity are true. So the part of the model that tells us why light is a constant in all reference frames is missing!

All theories are based on postulates that are expressed in mathematical form.  In the case of relativity, the postulate that light always travels at the speed of light in all reference frames is not only assumed to be true but has been experimentally shown to be true. Einstein suspected this fact about light’s speed after Maxwell derived the speed of light from his equations. Maxwell’s equations are also experimentally true and these equations have no regard to the reference frames in which its verifying experiments are carried out in.

So why is relativity true? Because its postulate is experimentally true.  Although this seems to be enough to satisfy physics academia, it is not enough for a person looking to solve the theory of everything.  Using the mathematics of GR as a starting point to solve the theory of everything will always be fruitless.

This article exposes a philosophical problem within academic physics…  Physicists have lost their philosophical roots.  A philosopher would never be satisfied with the answer to a question, because “it just is”.  And herein lies the reason why physicists are floundering in their own theoretically created mathematical quagmire.

Let’s Chat About… Primordial Soup!

An article in Science Magazine dated Feb 9, 2016 entitled,”The universe’s primordial soup flowing at CERN” states that “Researchers have recreated the universe’s primordial soup in miniature format by colliding lead atoms with extremely high energy in the 27 km long particle accelerator, the LHC at CERN in Geneva.”

Note that the article states that physicists at CERN “recreated” primordial soup that existed moments after the big bang. This statement does not leave any room to question whether what they have created was actually primordial soup of the big bang or not. I find this assumption somewhat arrogant.

Physicists created their model of the big bang by working the math contained in our current theories backwards in time. But what if there is a huge piece of the puzzle missing, oh…  let’ say for example, the 85% of the universe’s energy that physicists know nothing about?  Do you think that there is perhaps some tiny chance that this whopping amount of energy may have played at least a small part in the big bang?  I certainly do.

The problem is that physicists will not know what happened during the big bang unless they know what all this dark energy and dark matter is.  They will not know what dark matter and dark energy is until they know the theory of everything.  They will not know the theory of everything until they know what happened during the big bang.  Using the mathematics of our current theories will not lead to any solutions because our current theories describe the behavior and interactions of particles in our current universe. Our understanding of our current universe is expressed in our current mathematical construct which is obviously missing something.  Perhaps the dark energy may have played a more important role in our universe during the time of the big bang.  If that is true, then our current math cannot be useful in determining what existed during the big bang.

Gordon’s theory of everything proposes that the missing ingredient is the E0 energy of spacetime. This energy associated with the GOD Entities of spacetime jumped to higher Gordon Energy States during the collapse of the parallel planar universe as our current spacetime was formed. The gradient within the E0 energy of the early universe accelerated all the mass containing particles outwards and away from each other. This large E0 energy gradient easily overcame the very weak attractive force of gravity created by the mass contained in these particles.

It will take a long time for physicists to realize just how far off the right track they have wandered.  But the real problem is…   they love their perfect math and they checked and rechecked all the experimental data.  Physicists are so sure that they did everything right that they can’t fathom the thought that anything is wrong…  Hence the declaration… “The universe’s primordial soup flowing at CERN!”

Let’s chat about…. Gravitational Waves

Einstein’s wildest prediction could be confirmed within days

Gravitational waves do exist…   but they do not exist in the way that physicists think they do.  Physicists believe that the wave is actually “in” the fabric of spacetime.  That is not the case!   What physicists are seeing as a wave is two gravitational energy fields created by the two massive moving bodies of E2 energy that extends their E2 energy infinitely throughout the universe. These E2 energy fields change the total amount of energy seen on what physicists are interpreting as a constant fabric of spacetime that can bend.  Note that physicists believe that spacetime is not made of energy. Physicists believe that spacetime is made of nothing which is constantly nothing everywhere.   Gordon’s theory of everything shows that spacetime is composed of E0 energy. What physicists see as a wave in the fabric of spacetime is in actuality the change in the total E2 energies coexisting with the E0 energy of spacetime  —   The waveform is not in the fabric of spacetime itself, it is created by the changing amounts of E2 energy co-existing on top of the E0 energy of spacetime.  Einstein also did not realize this as he went along with the notion that particles containing mass somehow “bend” spacetime.  And this is why GR was considered by Einstein himself to be incomplete. By saying that spacetime could bend, it had to be composed of “something” that was able to “change”.  This is why Einstein believed that spacetime had to be a medium.
 
Here is the ironic part…   The E0 energy of spacetime does not need to change to have the equations of relativity be completely valid.  What is being construed as a wave in the fabric of spacetime is the percentage amounts of the combined E2 energies with E0 energy.  This means that E0 can be any constant (currently set at zero by the current model of physics) and yet the “relative” waveform remains intact.
This is why physicists are in such a dilemma.  All the math that is derived in GR will always be experimentally verified  (and here is the problem) The experimental results will never give any reason for physicists to question the validity of their current model.  In other words to fix their “real” problem, there is no place for them to recognize where the problem exists.
That is why physicists will never be able to solve the TOE…   They have to think of something to solve a problem that they know exists BUT don’t why the problem exists in the first place.   For the rigid logically thinking physicists and mathematicians – that is very unlikely to happen from within.  Ironically once the answer is solved – it contains all the beautiful math that substantiates its validity.

Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 10: The Unknown Hierarchy of Energy

The Unknown Hierarchy of Energy

It turns out that energy is the key to explaining our universe, for without energy nothing can exist. There is a hierarchy of energy that exists in the universe that up until now has gone unrecognized. Gordon’s theory of everything achieves unification by finding the last of the three energy states that exist in our universe and then shows how these energy states are related through one simple equation.

One energy state sprung from Einstein’s theory of special relativity when he derived the expression E = mc2 (or E2 = m2c2) where the E2 energy state is associated with matter (and anti-matter), mass, and gravity. Planck found another energy state when he showed that the energy of light came in packets expressed by the equation E = hv which can be alternatively expressed as E1 = (h/λ)c1 (or E1 = m1c1) where the E1 energy state is associated with the theory of quantum mechanics and light.

The missing piece of the puzzle found by Gordon is the E0 energy state (E0 = m0c0) where E0 energy is the energy associated with the entities that create space-time. These three equations are expressed as

EG = mGcG  

and is referred to as,  “The GOD Equation”.

The subscript and exponential term G represent one of the three independent co-existing Gordon energy states with values of {0, 1, 2}.  The mG term represents the displacement and/or motion of the underlying space-time medium associated with each energy state.

What can be simpler than this equation uniting the theory of relativity, the theory of quantum mechanics, mass, gravity, the gravitational constant, light, Planck’s constant, electromagnetism, all four known forces of nature, and the space-time medium?

Let’s talk about… Physicists Must Accept That Some Things Are Unknowable

Let’s talk about…   Physicists Must Accept That Some Things Are Unknowable

Appearring in Forbes magazine on Jan 17, 2016, a rundown of the current understanding of the Big Bang was written by blogger Professor Ethan Seigel of “Starts With A Bang”.  Apparently from this current understanding, Seigel felt compelled to write this article expressing that there are some things that we are just not going to know.

How sad it is to see that there are those who are willing to capitulate to such a dismal end in our quest for knowledge of how we came to be.  The only thing that is unknowable is why the energy of the universe, “Always was, always is, and always will be.” Many errors have been introduced into the picture of the Big Bang, where the process of inflation and expansion still need adjustments. However the corrections will not be forthcoming because physicists refuse to humble themselves and admit that their basic fundamental model of the universe is incorrect. Theoretical physics took a wrong turn over 100 years ago when they went against Einstein and abandoned the correct notion that spacetime is an energy medium.

http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

That is not the only reason… many other reasons have been posted here under the heading: Why the theory of everything took so long?

Only when you know the TOE can you figure out what happened at the Big Bang.

This scenario predicted by the TOE seems much more logical and is mathematically sound. It will take a very long time for the theoretical physicists to admit they have been outsmarted by an engineer.  Currently the delay in acknowledging (or even reading about this new theory) is because physicists reject the premise that spacetime is made of “something” as they steadfastly “know” that spacetime is made of nothing.

Of course this new model doesn’t fit into what they currently “know”. As Mark Twain once said, “ It’s not what you don’t know that kills you, it’s what you know for sure that ain’t true.” How ironic is it that Professor Seigel named his blog, “Starts With A Bang”, since even this notion that has been ingrained into the minds of nearly all theoretical physicists as an absolute doctrine is incorrect.  The universe did not “start” with what physicists call the Big Bang!