Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 9: Direct Approach to Solve the Theory of Everything

Direct Approach to Solve the Theory of Everything

In trying to solve the theory of everything, the first problem encountered is, where do you start? There seems to be nothing wrong with the theories of relativity or quantum mechanics or the postulates from which they were created.  The math in these theories was correctly derived and conforms to almost all the experimental data ever generated. It’s almost as if there is no problem to solve; yet something is missing since we do not have all the answers. It is hard to find what is missing if you have no idea what it is that is missing.

An analogy can be made with a tasty apple pie. The recipe for the apple pie is perfect and provides a yummy treat that we can recreate every time. As far as anyone knows, nothing is missing from this pie as we indulge in its deliciousness. Now compare that to an apple pie where the recipe calls for cinnamon. That would be an even tastier apple pie (by most people) but since no one ever knew that cinnamon could be an ingredient in an apple pie, it was never considered to be missing. Once cinnamon is placed in the recipe, it would seem that it should have been there all along.

Finding the missing ingredient in our current theories (the cinnamon) cannot be approached by directly questioning relativity and/or quantum mechanics (tasting the apple pie). The approach has to be by questioning the ingredients (the postulates) used to make the apple pie (the theory). We need to “see” something in our spice rack that we have never considered before. It is only this type of indirect approach of finding the missing ingredient that will lead us to solving the theory of everything.

Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 8: Parameters Taken for Granted

Parameters Taken for Granted

Gordon’s Theory of Everything starts with the true void and uses only two primordial postulates to create our universe and everything in it. Nothing additional is ever required to explain anything else. There is an inevitable progression of events that is dictated by the evolving mathematics of the two primordial postulates. Parameters we take for granted such as distance, direction, speed of light, mass, charge, and others are mathematically defined as they come to exist in the Gordon model. If a physicist tries to figure out the theory of everything by using these parameters before defining them and showing how they come to exist, then he or she has already passed the point in which to solve the theory of everything.

Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 7: Backwards Extrapolation of Current Mathematics

Backwards Extrapolation of Current Mathematics

Physicists are doing the best they can by extrapolating backwards to figure out how it all started; but they cannot work past the Big Bang.  Is it possible to figure out what caused the Big Bang?  Surprisingly the answer is yes, but only if you have already figured out the theory of everything. This represents a Catch-22 where we need to solve what existed before the Big Bang to tell what caused the Big Bang. There are a few hints which seemed to have been overlooked by physicists, these include: space-time is a medium, photons are polarized, distance cannot be defined as a set of points, and the mathematics should be relatively less complicated earlier in the progressive development of our universe. This makes sense if we make the logical assumption that our universe reached its current level of complexity from less complexity.

The following is a list of falsehoods that are thought to be true because of the errors introduced by extrapolating our current theories and mathematics backwards.

  1. The universe started with the Big Bang as a singularity where “nothing” existed before – False
  2. At the time of the Big Bang, the universe was hot – False
  3. Primordial particles of matter did not contain mass – False
  4. Almost the same amount of anti-matter was created as matter – False (mostly baryons of matter were created)
  5. Gravity had to be turned on – False

From Section 6.4 – ”Do Photons Traveling in Tandem Interact with Each Other?”

The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything by Scott S Gordon

From Section 6.4 – ”Do Photons Traveling in Tandem Interact with Each Other?”:

Consider two identical ideal compression- leading photons traveling along the same x direction through equi-energy spacetime with their planar energy fields aligned parallel to one other. They are separated by one quantum distance along their directional diameters so that each photon is in the other’s region of energy. We will not consider how they obtained this orientation but only the consequences of this configuration once it exists.

Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 6: The Ruby Slipper Conundrum

The Ruby Slipper Conundrum

Probably the most difficult obstacle to overcome in finding (and understanding) the theory of everything is what I have coined, the “Ruby Slipper Conundrum”.  The reason why it is called the “Ruby Slipper Conundrum” is explained in Section 7.3 of “The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything”.

Once you consider that space-time could be a medium, you need to determine what the basic building block of that medium is; and herein lies a huge problem!  Everything we know to exist; exists “in” space-time.  We have no other choice but to understand the properties of particles, their interactions, and resulting phenomena as they exist “in” space-time.

I use the word entity for the building block “of” space-time to distinguish it from particles that exists “in” space-time. The question to ask is; do we possess the mental capacity to conceive of this entity’s mathematical properties in the manner in which it actually exists?  Such an entity cannot be mathematically expressed as a particle “in” space-time because it does not exist “in” space-time; it exists “as” space-time. Mathematically describing such an entity has never been done before in the history of physics!

Let’s consider what would happen if we were to pluck one of these entities out of its structural position of space-time and place it where no space-time exists (isolated in the true void).  Can we possibly conceive of its properties and describe them mathematically where it would make sense to us. I can assure you that no one, not even our greatest minds in physics, can think that far “outside the box”.  Because this has never been done before, the mathematics of this entity would be impossible to accept without first going through the “Ruby Slipper Conundrum”. This is why when reading “The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything”, you must commit to reading the entire book.

Let’s talk about… Physicists Investigate Unusual Form of Quantum Mechanics

Physicists Investigate Unusual Form of Quantum Mechanics

In an article appearing in phys.org, Dec. 8, 2015, author Lisa Zyga reports, “Although it would be difficult to experimentally realize a magnetic field containing monopoles (as monopoles may not even exist), the scientists hope that the effects predicted here may be tested in the not-so-distant future.”

Gordon’s Theory of Everything provides a more definitive statement. According to the Gordon model, all energy exists on a plane. Photons of E1 energy moving at c can only exist if the photon moves along one of its planar energy directions. The photon’s planar energy has a kinetic energy vector along the direction of the photon’s motion as it moves in three dimensional spacetime. The electric field vector lies on the photon’s energy plane that is perpendicular to the direction of the photon’s motion. The non-energy direction within the volume of the photon is perpendicular to the photon’s planar energy and corresponds to the direction of the magnetic field vector. (This internal structure of photons explain why photons are polarized.)

In the formation of fundamental G2 particles [containing E2 energy (mass)] E1 energy must be locked within an internal configuration.  The only way to lock this energy into a particle is to have this E1 energy make the jump to the next Gordon energy state. The only possible configuration for the E1 energy to make the jump to the G2 Gordon energy state is with the kinetic vector aligned along a circular circumferential path where the other independent planar energy direction that holds the electric field vector is aligned along the radial direction of the G2 particle. The non-energy direction perpendicular to the E2 energy planes within the particle can never be aligned in the radial direction in a fundamental G2 particle; thus a fundamental G2 particle can never exist as a magnetic monopole.

Unfortunately since the theory of everything was discovered outside of academic physics, the physicists have not yet learned the hierarchy of energy and the GOD equation that unifies everything in our universe. Gordon’s Theory of Everything provides the missing foundation on which the field of physics needs to be rebuilt.  Once a few top physicists learn Gordon’s Theory of Everything, they will advance the Gordon model and start to solve all that is unknown…   the race in physics will be on.

T’was the Time Before Creation…

T’was the time before creation, and not a thing was in sight,
Not a proton or neutron, not even light!

All that existed was aligned on a plane,
Forming just two dimensions, no more to explain.

What were aligned on this plane, was given a name,
They’re called GOD entities, from which everything came.

The plane began to ripple, then went on to tear,
That’s when the third dimension started to appear.

All the GOD entities joined in on a race,
To form a cubic lattice and create 3D space.

Those locked out of the matrix, gave rise to our sight,
They became the first photons  —  Let there be light!

These photons all led with a negative charge first,
Which is why matter was created from the Big Bang burst.

When particles came forth, they were all we could see,
And the GOD entities remained hidden from you and from me.

Physicists know they are missing a vital key thing,
And try to find it by smashing protons in a 27 mile ring

But smash as they may, using all the energy they can,
It’s hard to find something that can’t be seen by man.

Because they can’t see it, or touch it, they say,
It just can’t exist! That’s the physicists’ way.

It’s impossible to find GOD in their chambers of steel,
They just have to believe, that GOD entities are real.

To find the true story of creation, there’s only one place to look,
The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything – It’s all there in my book !!!

 

From Section 4.17 – “The Normalization of Distance within a Photon”

The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything by Scott S Gordon

From Section 4.17 -  “The Normalization of Distance within a Photon”:

The concept of space-time being displaced within a photon’s bounded region of energy provides an excellent initial way for us to understand the underlying workings of the Gordon model. It will also prove useful in helping define new parameters as Gordon’s theory of everything is advanced; however, we need to keep in mind a process called normalization. Once explained, it will seem to contradict everything the Gordon model has presented in terms of displacements.

We need to be comfortable in conceiving the Gordon model in terms of normalization and displacement concurrently. At first, it may not seem possible, but when you truly understand the Gordon model, you will see that these views are compatible and mathematically consistent.

The Gordon Model’s solution for… “The Arrow (Direction) of Time”

The GOD Entity: Gordon’s Theory of Everything by Scott S Gordon

The Gordon Model’s solution for…  “The Arrow (Direction) of Time”:

We ponder whether it is possible to go back in time. Gordon’s theory of everything reveals that time in the universe must always move in one direction along with the increasing entropy of the GOD entities. The rate of perceived time decreases as energy concentration increases, and increases as energy concentrations decrease. The energy of the universe from its very inception has been transforming from potential energy to kinetic energy, moving the GOD entities of space-time farther apart, and there is no way to stop it. That also means that there is no way to reverse the transformation, so time will always move forward. Although time can be relatively slower in regions of the universe containing very high ALEDs, it can never reverse.

Why the Theory of Everything Took So Long? – Reason 5: The Concept of Infinite Scales

The Concept of Infinite Scales

Many of you may be wondering if string theory (or any version thereof) could hold the answer.  As a person who did not go through the selection process to become a physicist, it is much easier for me to see the major fundamental shortcoming in all versions of string theory that immediately disqualify them as possible solutions to the theory of everything. String theory, along with every other theory proposed so far to solve the theory of everything, does not address the problem presented in what I refer to as “The Concept of Infinite Scales”.

We consider distance as a property (parameter) of space-time (and it is). We define distance as a set of points along a path. However a point has no dimensions and therefore cannot have distance. It doesn’t matter how many points you “string” together, points cannot create distance. Therefore, points along a path cannot be used to define the distance along a path because there are always an infinite number of points between any two points. The manner in which we conceptualize distance is incorrect and thus the parameter of distance remains undefined in all our current theories.

In string theory, the first entity placed into our universe is a string. However a string has length which is measured by distance. Is it possible to define everything in the universe by using a theory where the first entity used to create the universe has the undefined property of distance?

Physicists openly wonder why there seems to be two major theories that describe our universe, one that works for large scales and one that works for small scales. The underlying reason is that neither theory accounts for the problem presented in the concept of infinite scales.